Indian penal code 420 punishment. What is the punishment for IPC 420? 2019-01-11

Indian penal code 420 punishment Rating: 7,8/10 1561 reviews

What is the punishment for IPC 420?

indian penal code 420 punishment

If seventy-five rupees be paid or levied at the time of the expiration of the first month, or at any later time while A continues in imprisonment. Section 411 : Dishonestly receiving stolen property: Classification of Offence: Punishment :Imprisonment for 3 years, or fine, or both. Illustrations a A Collector exercising jurisdiction in a suit under Act 10 of 1859, is a judge. But he is liable only to one punishment for the whole beating. B, in consequence of the instigation, causes grievous hurt to Z.

Next

Maximum punishment in Criminal 420 IPC case..

indian penal code 420 punishment

A has committed the offence defined in this section. Sale of counterfeit Government stamp Whoever, sells, or offers for sale, any stamp which he knows or has reason to believe to be a counterfeit of any stamp issued by the Government for the purpose of revenue, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Here A has extort­ed the purse from Z by putting him in fear of instant hurt, and being at the time of committing the extortion in his presence. A administers the poison; Z dies in consequence. Omission to assist public servant when bound by law to give assistance Whoever, being bound by law to render or furnish assistance to any public servant in the execution of his public duty, intentionally omits to give such assistance, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees, or with both; and if such assistance be demanded to him by a public servant legally competent to make such demand for the purposes of executing any process lawfully issued by a Court of Justice, or of preventing the commission of an offence, or of suppressing a riot, or affray, or of apprehending a person charged with or guilty of an offence, or of having escaped from lawful custody, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.


Next

Maximum punishment in Criminal 420 IPC case..

indian penal code 420 punishment

A takes the child and threatens to fling it down a precipice, unless Z delivers his purse. It was held that institution of criminal proceedings was without locus standi the dispute being of civil nature, and mere failure to keep the promise to the bid amount is not sufficient to fasten liability under section 420 of the Code, and issuance of the process was illegal for absence of dishonest intention. Where the accused persons did not send documents to a bank where they were waiting for full payment, but instead made part payment to the carriers directly and obtained delivery of the goods, it was held that they were guilty under this section. It was held that the intention of the accused must be judged not in the light of the actual circumstances, but in the light of what he supposed to be the circumstances. Central Bureau of Investigation, the Bombay High Court ruled that punishment of imprisonment under section 420 could not be imposed on juristic person like a construction company. State Amendments In section 276, State Amendments are the same as under section 272.

Next

Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code

indian penal code 420 punishment

Punishment for intentionally running vessel agground or ashore with intent to commit theft, etc. This is the Urdu translation of Section 302, Indian Penal Code, which lays down the punishment for murder. Here, as A has a right to use the horse, he does not dishonestly misappropriate it. Illustration A writes his name on the back of a bill of exchange. Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house, etc.

Next

Maximum punishment in Criminal 420 IPC case..

indian penal code 420 punishment

Assault or criminal force in attempt wrongfully to confine a person Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person, in attempting wrongfully to confine that person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. That a or b or c have to be read conjunctively with d and e. A has committed an offence under this section. Delivery of Indian coin, possessed with knowledge that it is altered Whoever, having coin in his possession with respect to which the offence defined in section 247 or 249 has been committed, and having known at the time when he became possessed of such coin that such offence had been committed, delivers such coin to any other person, or attempts to induce any other person to receive the same, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Right of private defence against deadly assault when there is risk of harm to innocent person If in the exercise of the right of private defence against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person his right or private defence extends to the running of that risk.

Next

Sections 425 to 440 : Indian Penal Code 1860

indian penal code 420 punishment

Added by Act 3 of 1894, sec. Illustrations A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter Z, in good faith, taking A for a house-breaker, attacks A. A sells it immediately without attempting to discover the owner. Mischief by causing inundation or obstruction to public drainage attended with damage Whoever commits mischief by doing any act which causes or which he knows to be likely to cause an inundation or an obstruction to any public drainage attended with injury or damage, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both. Altering appearance of coin with intent that it shall pass as coin of different description Whoever performs on any coin any operation which alters the appearance of that coin, with the intention that the said coin shall pass as a coin of a different description, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.


Next

Sections 493 to 498A : Indian Penal Code 1860

indian penal code 420 punishment

Delivery of coin, possessed with knowledge that it is altered Whoever, having coin in his possession with respect to which the offence defined in section 246 or 248 has been committed, and having known at the time when he became possessed of such coin that such offence had been committed with respect to it, fraudulently or with intent that fraud may be committed, delivers such coin to any other person, or attempts to induce any other person to receive the same, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, and shall also be liable to fine. . As per Concise Oxford Dictionary, 9th Edition, p. People below hold out a blanket. A finds a valuable ring, not knowing to whom it belongs. Injury which is likely to cause death and injury which is sufficient in ordinary course of nature to cause death i Accused inflicted 18 injuries in the arms and legs of the deceased with a gandasa.

Next

Indian Penal Code: 5 Laws Of The IPC In Popular Culture

indian penal code 420 punishment

But A is guilty of abetting theft, and is liable to the same punishment as if B had committed theft. Illustration A, an officer of police, being legally bound to give information of all designs to commit robbery which may come to his knowledge, and knowing that B designs to commit robbery, omits to give such information, with intent to facilitate the commission of that offence. Explanation 1 A person who causes bodily injury to another who is labouring under a disorder, disease or bodily infirmity, and thereby accelerates the death of that other, shall be deemed to have caused his death. Circumstantial evidence — Importance It is well settled that if the evidence of the eye-witnesses are held to be reliable and inspire confidence then the accused cannot be acquitted solely on the ground that some superficial injuries found on the person of the accused concerned, had not been explained by the prosecution; A. Here, though A and C have not conspired together, yet C has been engaged in the conspiracy in pursuance of which Z has been murdered.


Next