Because the locals expect him to do the job, he does so against his better judgment, his anguish increased by the elephant's slow and painful death. The author told the story that took place in Moulmain, in Lower Burma with a sub-divisional police officer during the time when Burma was a British colony. I perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys. It was not long after the incident that he was transferred from Moulmein to a quiet post in called Katha. The shame pressed down on his shoulders with an unbearable weight. The colonization does not affect the powerless natives only, but also the colonizer. This principle sets up the story for Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell.
He repeatedly uses metaphorical language to develop this connection. The Burmese people have an intense disdain for their British oppressors, but while the narrator internally agrees and sympathizes with them, he also knows that he has a job and a position to uphold for the time being. Orwell was worried he could hardly do anything but then he decided that he must see. When we see him shooting the elephant, we are seeing the same demonstration of force the British imperialists use over the Burmese people. There are people who can handle the pressure from the expectation and there are people who cannot. They laugh at the protagonist and sneer at him when he passes them. In the end our narrator is stuck between his duties and his convictions and he in on a vicious circle from which it seen to be hard to get out from.
Because of this, Shooting an Elephant can be considered an effective piece of writing. He did not like the society that he lived in. Dravidian: Lower-caste Indian who speaks his own language, Dravidian. He was unsuccessful and then decided to try his hand as a dramatist. The British officials were bound by rules which they had to follow and as such they could not extend a friendly hand towards the locals since they were expected to play the sahib. He is an instrument of the will of the people he severs, just like totalitarian governments.
The story takes place at some time during the five unhappy years Orwell spends as a British police officer in Burma. The narrator is a Young Englishman serving as a police officer in Burma in the 1920s, when Burma was part of British-controlled India. The policeman symbol As a police officer, Orwell's presence holds symbolic power within Burmese society. So, being British and working for the British Empire he was expected to be a leader. Feelings like these are the normal by-products of imperialism; ask any Anglo-Indian official, if you can catch him off duty. Orwell uses the shooting of the elephant to the plight of the Burmese people and their unbroken will in some civil disobedience.
In addition, like the narrator said in the story, being tyrant, which can also be interpreted as being one who have dominance and power against another, means destroying your own freedom. It shows his frustration over the situation that the imperialists had created. Bazaar: Marketplace on a street with walk-in shops and outdoor stalls. Orwell could not get any definite information from the locals because in the East the more accurate a description seems, he more inaccurate it gets when you approach the scene. One of the obvious critiques of the story is that of peer pressure.
They were interested in seeing the elephant being shot dead and while Orwell did not intend to kill the animal but had got the rifle just to protect himself in case the beast went wild; he had already started feeling like a fool. Resolution The narrator recounts the aftermath of the shooting. I did not even know that the British Empire is d~Irig, stiIlless did I know that it is a great de al better than the younger empires that are going to su~pi~nt it. Shooting an Elephant In all societies we can be forced to do something because it is expected of us. After all, Orwell was an open critic of imperialism during the early 20 th Century.
The story is about a young British man who serves as a police officer in Burma, which is part of British India in the 1920s. A crowd of thousands gathers as the officer approaches the elephant, rifle in hand. The narrator at this point has had his opinion about imperialism reflect on his actions by almost turning around and forgetting about shooting the elephant. Orwell's self-consciousness as the face of British imperialism is central to his internal conflict as he tries to uphold the image of the impenetrable empire while going against his personal inclination, and killing an elephant that he doesn't want to kill. The narrator sends someone for an elephant rifle and a crowd gathers. And if that happened it was quite probable that some of them would laugh. This is now the concept that most modern day families have adopted.
British imperialism Throughout the essay Orwell explicitly discusses the nature of British imperialism, specifically the way that he, as a police officer, both represents and internalizes the imperial project. The only things in his mind are probably to make the natives happy and to make himself a better relationship with the local. Urged along by the eagerness of the crowd of civilians that has ganged up around him, he takes the kill shot. The beast had appeared there suddenly and picked the man by his trunk before grinding him with his feet. Orwell puts multiple bullets into the elephant, but in the end he has to leave to bleed to death.